Thursday, February 20, 2020
Background of GCC , Egypt and Malaysia Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words
Background of GCC , Egypt and Malaysia - Essay Example The findings inferred will be discussed in the concluding sections of the project. Gulf Cooperation Council regions have huge reserves for oil and natural gas and most the countries in the world countries are depended on it for its daily supply of energy. The GCC region includes six countries from the Middle East. These countries are United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, and Bahrain. These six countries came together in 1981 to form the ââ¬ËGulf Cooperation Councilââ¬â¢ in order to cooperate, coordinate and integrate various policies, politics and economic affairs (Laabas & Limam, 2002). The GCC agreement has helped these countries to avoid foreign intervention regarding oil and gas procurement.HH The oil and gas reserves present in these countries are its most vital resource and the key to its prosperity. Around ââ¬Å"40% of the worldââ¬â¢s proven oil and 23.6% of the worldââ¬â¢s proven gas reservesâ⬠are held by GCC countries (Reiche, 2010). The population growth rates in these countries are indebted to the high economic deve lopment and increasing employment opportunities. Nearly, 39 million people are living in these countries which accounts for 0.06% of the total world population (Reiche, 2010). Table 1 depicts the economic and socio-demographic indicators of GCC countries projecting the expected population growth in 2015. Gulf Cooperation Council regions are rich in oil and natural gas reserves and their economic development is solely depended on it. Rising demand and price of oil and gas during 2002 to 2008 have further boosted the economic growth in GCC countries. Oil export contributes the major chunk of revenue in their overall GDP. Recently, their oil export has increased significantly and has reached to 67% as compared to 61% in 2002. However, this growth was not uniform in all the countries, with Qatar and Oman experiencing the downward slash. Table 2 depicts the government revenues, oil exports and
Tuesday, February 4, 2020
Vertebrate Evolution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
Vertebrate Evolution - Essay Example The issue of whether a more developed species is advanced or not is subject to how one defines advancement, and is not tackled in this paper because of its subjectivity. Related species usually share similar morphological and or anatomical characteristics. They can either be ancestor-descendant, or descendants from the same ancestor. The proximity of their relation is defined by the amount of evolutionary changes that occurred between them. For example, humans are closer to four-legged animals than to fish. Humans are closer to monkeys than they are to horses because of their opposable thumb. However, not all organisms that have a characteristic in common are closely related. Bats and birds are the only groups of vertebrates that share flight, but bats descended from a lineage of non-winged animals, and are thus more related to humans than they are to birds. Possible relations among groups (A, B and C) can be depicted through a cladogram (Figure 1). Cladistics, the process behind making a cladogram, is usually based on morphology, but can also be made from anatomy or embryology, for example. It is a branching diagram in which the base is occupied by the closest common ancestor. It may be extant, and as such be one of the groups, but it may also be hypothetical, like in this case, and as such is left as blank. From it, a character that differentiates the groups from their closest common ancestor is placed on the branch leading to A, B, and C (tick mark). Because groups A and B are more closely related to each other than to C, the defining characteristic that made them different from C is also placed in the diagram (double tick mark). Points of bifurcation represent hypothetical ancestors. A number of cladograms can be made in relating A, B, and C to one another, but it is usually the tree with the minimum number of evolutionary changes t hat is preferred (Kent and Carr 2004,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)